老司机福利网

Skip to main content
Dr. Ronaldo Luna with students on a site visit near a Missouri bridge

Water Under the Bridge

 A first-of-its-kind study from the Water Access, Technology, Environment and Resource (WATER) Institute at 老司机福利网 brings new awareness to bridge safety across Missouri.

When people think of Missouri, their first thought is not usually of the many rivers that flow across the state. With two of America鈥檚 longest rivers carving their way through the state, water is an essential part of Missouri鈥檚 identity 鈥 as are the thousands of bridges built over these bodies of water.

Missouri is home to over 25,000 bridges on its state system, most of which cross a variety of waterways from small creeks to major rivers. Many Missourians cross these bridges daily without a second thought, but time takes its toll on the stability of these structures 鈥 as does bridge scour, the erosion of the soil surrounding a bridge鈥檚 foundation in a body of water.

Bridge scour is the leading cause of bridge failure nationwide. This alarming statistic prompted the Missouri Department of Transportation (MoDOT) to partner with an institution that would conduct bridge-scour analysis on a list of 鈥渟cour critical鈥 bridges developed in the 1990s. The Water, Access, Technology, Environment and Resources (WATER) Institute at 老司机福利网 was selected as this institution.
In April 2020, the WATER Institute was awarded the 鈥淪cour Analysis on Missouri Bridges鈥 project by MoDOT. They compiled a research team led by Amanda Cox, Ph.D., PE, associate professor of civil engineering and director of the WATER Institute, and Ronaldo Luna, Ph.D., PE, professor of civil engineering. The goal was to examine bridge scour on several Missouri bridges and report on their long-term stability by evaluating how newer hydraulic modeling methods and improved data resolutions impact predicted scour depths. The team completed its work and published its final report in July 2023.

"It鈥檚 a study that has never been done before,鈥 said Cox. 鈥淚t is the first study that we have found that looks at [bridge scour in this way], so it's truly a first-of-its-kind study, and it will impact MoDOT's decisions on how they look at vulnerable bridges.鈥

Scouring Our State Rivers

Four people are on a boat in a river, working with various pieces of equipment. Behind them, a shoreline with rocks and trees without leaves are visible.
The SLU WATER Institute team adjusts equipment in the water at a study site.

Bridge scour is composed of three types: local, contraction and long-term scour. Cox and Luna鈥檚 team specifically took a closer look at local scour, which is the removal of material that lies at the abutments and piers of a bridge, and contraction scour, which removes materials from the bed and banks across the water channel width.

The team examined how much scour is predicted to occur during major weather events 鈥 specifically, 100-year and 500-year flooding 鈥 and how this could impact a bridge鈥檚 future stability. They explored five sites throughout the state, including two larger sites on the Gasconade and Missouri rivers. The team selected bridges for their variety in water size, flow patterns, sediment levels, and other factors that were monitored by contrasting one-dimensional (1D) and two-dimensional (2D) hydraulic modeling. Hydraulic modeling illustrates and computes the changes in water depth, quantity and currents.

In addition, they also conducted fieldwork at each unique bridge site to support the scour risk assessment. SLU faculty, graduate students and undergraduate students participated in GPS mapping, the collection and analysis of soil samples, and surveying river bathymetry, or the investigation of underwater channel surfaces.

Previously, bridge-scour analysis in Missouri only went as far as utilizing 1D computer models to estimate the intensities from unique swirls, angles and slopes of water movement against a bridge鈥檚 foundation. However, 1D modeling only captures the flow downstream.

鈥淸Model techniques] have evolved over time to go from more simple, which we call 1D models that only look at the flow of downstream river direction, to more sophisticated numerical models [like 2D modeling],鈥 she said. 鈥淚t looks at the flow in both the downstream and lateral direction so [we] can see swirling flows and other more complex flow patterns that actually exist in the real-world environment,鈥 she said.

A pair of hands type on a laptop keyboard, while the screen shows charts, graphs and data sets, situated with a river in the background.
A computer screen shows the data collected at one of the bridge-scour sites.

Cox explained that, for many years, 1D hydraulic modeling was the best way to estimate bridge scour, but the team鈥檚 research determined it was imperative to use the more advanced 2D modeling in order to gather the best results for the project.

Throughout their analysis, 2D modeling created a sharper picture of the complexities of water flow such as rivers with multiple bends or assessing obstructions in the water channels like logs and river debris. In their report, the SLU team recommended that MoDOT use 2D modeling for future predictive scour assessments to best anticipate bridge scour in our state.  

鈥淲ith 2D modeling, they now have tools that will automatically determine required input parameters based on the results of the numerical modeling,鈥 Cox explained. 鈥淭his gives less subjectivity and more precision.鈥

Out in the Field

It鈥檚 not every day that your classroom goes from a desk to a boat. But Peter Kickham, a research assistant with the WATER Institute, and his fellow student researchers set sail to make large contributions to the bridge-scour project.

鈥淚n less than a year as a WATER Institute research assistant, I have been able to go to six different streams or rivers to collect data, make observations, and learn while also having a great, immersive experience in nature and applying what I have learned in the field,鈥 Kickham said.  

Kickham is a recent graduate of SLU鈥檚 Master of Science in Civil Engineering program, and he chose to study water resources because of his early interest in weather and the necessity of water for all people.

鈥淚 see water as the common factor between not only all people on Earth, but all living things,鈥 Kickham said. 鈥淲hen we look for life on other planets, we don鈥檛 look for plants or animals, we look for water. That鈥檚 because it is our most important resource that everyone deserves.鈥

His passion for water propelled him into his role as a research assistant within the WATER Institute and ultimately landed him a role as a leader of the bridge-scour project alongside Cox and Luna. Kickham not only participated in scour modeling, but he also created graphics of water patterns and visited field sites to collect data and deploy the equipment used to examine bridge scour.

Two men wearing life jackets and reflective gear sit in a small boat on a river. They are holding a small piece of equipment on a rope. Rocky shore line with bare trees is visible in the background.
Kickham (left) and Luna (right) pose for a photo with some equipment used at a bridge-scour study site.

Cox was impressed by the caliber of SLU students such as Kickham, and she鈥檚 grateful for their contributions to the MoDOT project.

鈥淭hey helped with data collection, processing, numerical modeling and scour calculations,鈥 she said. 鈥淥ne of the main things they were able to do was help create all the visuals, graphs and charts. We have some exceptional undergraduate students who learn quite quickly and make significant contributions.鈥  

One undergraduate student was Warren Radford, who has since graduated from SLU with a Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering and works as a hydraulics engineer for the United States Army Corps of Engineers.

鈥淚 really enjoyed collecting our own data because I got to see exactly how all that data collection went directly into the work we did,鈥 Radford said. 鈥淚 enjoyed my experience because all of the professors in the SLU [civil] engineering department are [licensed] professional engineers, and it was interesting hearing from them about their experiences in the field.鈥

The WATER Institute believes experiences like this are crucial to shaping students into well-rounded researchers and professional engineers. Cox shared that Radford, Kickham, and another undergraduate student, Harrison Wooters, learned to use industry-standard software programs, and Kickham and Wooters wrote portions of the final MoDOT report. This unique experience sets SLU students apart from other students looking for similar jobs in engineering.

鈥淥ur students are able to become trained on software programs that are being used in the industry that are not always used in an academic environment,鈥 Cox said. 鈥淚ntroducing them to the concepts and getting them that expertise sets them up for success in jumping into projects when they end up getting an engineering position.鈥

Building Better Bridges

Four team members are shown from behind, wearing reflective vests that read Water Institute. One person points toward the distance as they look across the river at a shoreline of leafless trees.
The WATER Institute team surveys the area before beginning their fieldwork.

Bridge scour is not a new concern for Missouri bridges. However, recent weather events have made it even more important to assess our bridge鈥檚 structural integrity to ensure safety for all on the roads. The WATER Institute鈥檚 recommendations to MoDOT lay out a proactive plan that will reevaluate possible scour at other high-risk bridges throughout the state. MoDOT is evaluating these recommendations to construct its newest bridges and plan for the future impact of bridge scour throughout the state.

From the team鈥檚 extensive comparison of both modeling methods, 2D modeling will help in analyzing future scour risk along our state鈥檚 bridges. Its capability to show detailed models of terrain, flow velocity, scour depths, and other essential factors in assessing bridge scour will help improve bridge safety and Missouri bridge design.

"You want as much accuracy as possible in your predictions because of the significance of bridge scour, and its potential for bridge safety and our own safety,鈥 Cox said. "What we really wanted is the best estimate so we can make informed decisions about which bridges need extra attention. If we can identify [bridges] that are vulnerable, we can then go out and make those stronger."

 Story by Mary Pogue, senior copywriter, .

This piece was written for the 2023 SLU Research Institute Annual Impact Report. The Impact Report is printed each spring to celebrate the successes of our researchers from the previous year and share the story of SLU's rise as a preeminent Jesuit research university. Design, photography, and some writing contributions are made by . More information can be found here.